Drawing for ENOX

USPTO serial 79006494

ENOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3029476Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Beth Ciocco

Mary Beth Ciocco Mary Beth Ciocco, LLC22255 Center Ridge RoadSuite 106ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical reagents other than for medical or veterinary purposes; 2,4-Dichlor-Benzoyl Peroxide; 2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-di-(Butylperoxy) Hexane; Benzol Peroxide; T-Butyl Peroxy Benzoate; Di Tert Butyl Peroxide; Tert Butyl Hydroperoxide; 1,1-Bis (T-Butyl Peroxy) Cyclohexane; 1,1-Bis (T-Butyl Peroxy)-3,3,5-Trimethyl Cyclohexane; Carboxylic Silicon OilSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 20, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 18, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 7, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 3, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 25, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance