USPTO serial 79006498
MILLE MIGLIA VINTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLE MIGLIA VINTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Horological and chronometric instruments, namely watch hands, watch cases, watch straps, watch chains, chronographs for use as timepieces,chronographs for use as watches, chronometers for use as watches, watches, wristwatches, dress watches, clocks, watch and clock movements | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |