Drawing for SPIRIT

USPTO serial 79006503

SPIRIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3098311Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2006
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIRIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic, electrotechnical, electromechanical and electromagnetic modules, parts and components thereof, namely, electronic circuits, integrated circuits (ICs), computer chips, transistors, data and digital signal processors, digital signal processor cores, USB (universal serial bus) hardware, computer software for testing and verifying verification suites, semiconductors and semiconductor elements; computer software for developing, testing and verifying large System-on-Chip (SoC) productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, product research and development of large System-on-Chip (SoC) products; industrial product analyses and research for others, namely, creating and testing mechanisms for describing and handling IP that enable automated integration through plug-in tools; accreditation services, namely, developing, evaluating and testing standards for IP meta-data description, IP tool integration with API and IP packaging, for the purpose of accreditation; design and development of computers and computer software for others; legal services; computer programming for others; computer software and hardware developmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance