Drawing for QWST

USPTO serial 79006540

QWST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QWST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT P MICHAL

Robert P. Michal Frishauf Holtz Goodman & Chick PC220 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10001-7708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses; spectacle casesABANDONED—
018Unworked or semi-worked leather; imitation leather sold in bulk; goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely trunks, suitcases, umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks, travel bags, purses, wallets, rucksacks, school bags, sports bagsABANDONED—
025Clothing, namely jeans, pants, sweaters, track suits, sweatpants, coats, jackets, suits, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, blouses, tank tops, jerseys, skirts, dresses, beachwear, loungewear, Bermuda shorts, pedal pushers, infant wear, jumpsuits, parkas, polo shirts, vests, sport shirts, uniforms, sport coats, overcoats, raincoats, top coats, bathing suits, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, sportswear, namely ski wear, snowboard wear, surf wear, swim wear, tennis wear, sports underwear; beach cover-ups, bathrobes, pajamas, fur tops, fur jackets, belts; headgear, namely caps and hats; footwearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 26, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 26, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 26, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 14, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 16, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Aug 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 4, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jun 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance