Drawing for N-GAGE ARENA

USPTO serial 79006554

N-GAGE ARENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3120857Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with N-GAGE ARENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software for communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling users to play games with mobile phones; computer software and programs enabling users of communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; computer software enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus; virtual reality game software; mobile telephones and mobile telephones featuring short messaging, Internet access, MP3 player and radio; portable listening devices, namely, MP3 players and radios; downloadable computer game softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 30, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2013INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 18, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 15, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 15, 2011LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 15, 2011PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 3, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance