USPTO serial 79006586
SOLO LOEWE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021208Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SOLO LOEWE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
Karin Segall Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Avenue, Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Perfumery, perfumes, fragrance for personal use, ] eau-de-toilette [, eau-de-Cologne, ] [ essential oils, beauty creams, body lotions, ] [ deodorants for personal use, ] [ shaving creams ] [ and after-shave lotions ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 21, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 6, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 15, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 29, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |