USPTO serial 79006604
TANIN VR SUPRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3032522Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANIN VR SUPRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Solomon
Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical product used in wine production | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAFFORT HOLDING
- Other trademarks owned by LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
- Other trademarks owned by LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
- Other trademarks owned by LAFFORT OENOLOGIE
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named TANIN VR SUPRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 7, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |