CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BERKAM

USPTO serial 79006621

BERKAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3117308Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERKAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, overcoats, suits, pajamas, dresses; undergarments; shirts; trousers; knitwear, namely, sweaters; underwear; panties and underpants; children's clothing, namely, children's coats and trousersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 15, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 5, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance