USPTO serial 79006660
HYGROGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYGROGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |