USPTO serial 79006672
LEOVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEOVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic substances, namely, dietetic foods adapted for medical use; mineral food-supplements; nutritional additives for human consumption for medical purposes; candy for medical purposes; medicated candy; medicines for human purposes for the treatment of, for example, gastrointestinal illnesses; dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes; medicinal infusions for the treatment of, for example, gastrointestinal illnesses; decoctions for medical purposes for the treatment of for example, gastrointestinal illnesses; vitamin preparations,preparations of trace elements for human consumption; dietetic foods adapted for medical purposes; syrups for pharmaceutical purposes, namely, for example, cough syrups; tonic medicines; namely, tonics for the treatment of gastrointestinal illnesses; nervines, namely, for example, nerve tonics;digestives for pharmaceutical purposes; herbal teas for medicinal purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Bouillon concentrates; vegetables, cooked; tomato puree; preparations for making soup; soups; vegetable soup preparations; potato flakes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Gruel, with a milk base, for food; ice cream; sherbets (ices); cocoa beverages with milk; tea-based beverages; infusions, not medicinal; powder for edible ices; spices; oat-based food; starch products for food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Opinion polling; marketing studies; sales promotion (for others); distribution of samples; direct mail advertising; advertising; advertising by mail order; television advertising | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennostyu "LEOVIT nutrio"
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LEOVIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |