USPTO serial 79006726
EYE . OLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYE . OLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |