Drawing for BOEGLI

USPTO serial 79006737

BOEGLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051141Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOEGLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Clocks, pocket watches, pendant watches, wristwatches, fancy key rings made of precious metalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 29, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 3, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 3, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance