USPTO serial 79006746
BLACKSOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3059194Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2006
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BLACKSOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
Zug, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Denver, CO 80201United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blacksocks SA
- Other trademarks owned by Blacksocks SA
- Other trademarks owned by Blacksocks SA
- Other trademarks owned by Blacksocks SA
- Other trademarks owned by Jacob Rohner AG
- Other trademarks owned by Brandlab AG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named BLACKSOCKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - SEE PUBLIC NOTE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| May 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |