Drawing for DRM

USPTO serial 79006794

DRM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Repair of vehicles, installation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
039Transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activitiesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
043Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 19, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 19, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 16, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance