USPTO serial 79006799
BOMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
AT
Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
HU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
Catherine J. Holland Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Beers; mineral water and carbonated water; ] alcohol-free beverages with added mineral aggregates and vitamins, namely, energy drinks; [ fruit juices beverages, fruit juices and ] alcohol-free beverages with fruit flavour; isotonic freshening alcohol-free electrolyte beverages [ ; syrups, powders and fruit juice concentrates used in preparation of beverages ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bomba Energia Getränkevertriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BOMBA! ENERGY DRINK Kft.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BOMBA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |