Drawing for RESIST

USPTO serial 79006814

RESIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148850Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Patch

Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal blanks and discs coated with non-stick substances, namely, metal preforms for pots, pans, and baking sheetsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Non-electric kitchen utensils with non-stick coating, namely -- frying pans, saucepans, stewpots, earthenware saucepans, dishes for the ovenSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 26, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 21, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 13, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 13, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance