Drawing for TIOFF

USPTO serial 79006818

TIOFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIOFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIR ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs in the field of telecommunications, information and communication; computer operating programs, software and hardware; computer plug-in programs; Internet browsers; blank magnetic and optical data carriers; modems; and network equipment for use in telecommunication networks, data communication networks and mobile communication networks, namely routers and router serversSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Global telecommunication, data communication and mobile communication services, namely, providing multiple-user access to the Internet, data assisted electronic transmission of speech, sound, pictures and data, telephone communication services, mobile telephone communication services, and telecommunications routing services; telecommunications consultation relating to data and mobile communications networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programming for others; development of computer programs; hosting the web sites of othersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 24, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 2, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 2, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance