Drawing for EPAGE

USPTO serial 79006826

EPAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3679851Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2009
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AMY E. CARROLL

AMY E. CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer devices, namely, computer game consoles; hand held computer devices, namely, personal digital assistants, computer game terminals, handheld industrial terminals, hand held tablet computers for web browsing and hand held computers; mobile phones; electronic communication devices, namely, pagers, e-mail computer terminals, telephone sets with screens and fax machines; cable television apparatus and instruments, namely, cable television decoders; digital projectors, namely, multi-media projectors, conference room projectors, and digital photograph projectors; digital cameras; computer software for use in Internet browsing, voice and electronic messaging, image viewing, information retrieval, operating navigation systems and operating games; not marketed to retail consumers; computer graphics software; graphical user interface software; digital document processing computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Licensing of intellectual property relating to computer devices, hand-held computer devices, computer peripheral devices, mobile phones, electronic communication devices, cable television apparatus and instruments, including cable television decoders, digital projectors, digital cameras, computer chips, computer programs, computer programs for producing computer graphics, graphical user interface software and digital document processing computer software, not marketed to retail consumersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 8, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 8, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 30, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 30, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 21, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2006OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2006OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 1, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 25, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance