Drawing for BAGUTTA

USPTO serial 79006855

BAGUTTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073746Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAGUTTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK LEBOW

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; furniture for kitchens; modular furniture for kitchens; camping furniture, beds and parts therefor, namely, pillows, nets, mattresses; bed post boxes in non-metallic materials; box springsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024Table cloths, bed linen, synthetic fiber fabrics, semi-synthetic fiber fabrics; natural fiber fabrics, namely, fabrics of linen, cotton, wood, silk or combinations thereof; bed and table coversSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 19, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 3, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance