Drawing for GREAT

USPTO serial 79006856

GREAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 13, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance