USPTO serial 79006912
Serial No. 79006912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3095819Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 23, 2006
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79006912?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
NEIL F GREENBLUM GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Plumbing fittings, namely, valves for sanitary installations, cocks and cock valves, bibbs, shower and tub control valves, taps, faucets, spouts, pipes for sanitary facilities, couplers, aerators for faucets, drains, faucet filters, traps, sink sprayers, shower sprayers, shower control valves, showers, shower faucet extensions, shower head sprayers, shower heads, drain structures for use in baths, spas, and steam rooms, fixed spouts on walls and directly on baths, basins, and showers; components for shower heads and handsets for sanitary installations, namely control valves, filters and couplers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 23, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |