Drawing for Serial No. 79006912

USPTO serial 79006912

Serial No. 79006912

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095819Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79006912?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

NEIL F GREENBLUM GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Plumbing fittings, namely, valves for sanitary installations, cocks and cock valves, bibbs, shower and tub control valves, taps, faucets, spouts, pipes for sanitary facilities, couplers, aerators for faucets, drains, faucet filters, traps, sink sprayers, shower sprayers, shower control valves, showers, shower faucet extensions, shower head sprayers, shower heads, drain structures for use in baths, spas, and steam rooms, fixed spouts on walls and directly on baths, basins, and showers; components for shower heads and handsets for sanitary installations, namely control valves, filters and couplersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 6, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 13, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 30, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 30, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 5, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance