Drawing for ALM-X'TEN

USPTO serial 79006927

ALM-X'TEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3239929Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2007
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALM-X'TEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEYER A GROSS

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Lighting apparatus for medical use, namely lighting apparatus in operating theaters or for diagnostic purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 10, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 6, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 13, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 13, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 26, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 8, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 29, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
May 23, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance