USPTO serial 79006930
KENBOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3286484Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2007
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KENBOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY C. DICONZA
chien hoi sohROOM 102, NO 178, YUHOUNANLISIMING DISTRICTXIAMEN,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, casual wear, namely, pants, shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, dresses, skirts, and jackets; sportswear, namely, sport coats, sport jackets, sport shirts; swimming wear; fitness wear, namely, jogging pants, sports jerseys, sports bras, gym suits, gym shorts, tracksuits; bicycle wear, namely, bicycle gloves, bicycle shorts, bicycle pants; underwear; soccer wear, namely, soccer shoes, athletic uniforms, jerseys; basketball wear, namely, basketball sneakers, athletic uniforms, jerseys; running shoes with metal studs; judo shoes; wrestling shoes; gymnastic shoes; footwear; sports jerseys; sports shoes; football shoes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 28, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |