USPTO serial 79006951
ORGARAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGARAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical Preparations For The Treatment Of Cardiovascular Disease, Central Nervous System Diseases And Disorders, Neurological Disorders, Urological, Urogenital Disorders And, Gastrointestinal Disorders, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Allergies, Diabetes, Hypertension, Erectile Dysfunction, Sexual Dysfunction, Stroke, Cancer, Migraines, Pain, Obesity, Inflammation And Inflammatory Disease, Respiratory And Infectious Diseases, Immunological, Bacterial, Viral And Fungal Disorders, Mental Illness, Depression, Psychosis, Bone And Mineral Diseases, Infertility, Menopausal Complaints, Hormone Deficiencies, Sleep Disorders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |