Drawing for ULTRALIFT

USPTO serial 79006987

ULTRALIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRALIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesACTIVE—
005Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary products; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth and dental wax; disinfectants; products for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Jul 21, 2005DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance