USPTO serial 79007002
Serial No. 79007002
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3229986Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with Serial No. 79007002?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
Gregory N. Owen Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C.455 Market Street, Suite 1910Sann Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Welding and soldering tools, namely, gas operated soldering irons, [ autogenous soldering machines, laser welding machines, power operated crimping tools; machine coupling and transmission components other than for land vehicles, namely, gears, gearing mechanism, power transmissions, belt drives, ] mechanical control systems comprising synchronized push-pull wire drive control assemblies and electronic controllers; transmission for machines; industrial robots, welding robots, welding automation machines, namely, robots and automatic electric welding machines for electric arc welding; [ gas welding, electric soldering, laser welding and metal crimping; electric welding machines; ] feeding devices for metal wires, namely, power-operated machines for driving wires, feed plates for wire driving machines and push pull wire drive systems comprising synchronized wire drive machines and electronic controls therefor; [ blow torches, namely, gas operated cutting torches; ] engines not for land vehicles: component parts and replacement parts for the above machinery goods, namely, gears, feed rolls, insulation equipment comprising insulated gears, insulated mountings, insulated wire screws, guiding equipment, namely, wire straighteners, wire inlet guide, wire outlet guides | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring, signaling, checking and supervision apparatus and instruments, namely, instruments for controlling and regulating dc/ac motors, [ visual welding controlling systems composed of cameras, ] LCD video display monitors, electronic programmable logic controllers; pressure measuring apparatus and precision measuring apparatus, namely, instruments for measuring pressure, flow, temperature, heat, speed, acceleration, distance, resistance, current, voltage; electric welding equipment, namely, MIG/MAG hand welding torches, TIG hand welding torches, MIG/MAG robotic and automatic welding torches, TIG robotic and automatic welding torches, robotic and automatic laser welding torches, hand plasma welding and cutting torches, robotic and automatic plasma welding and cutting torches, fume extraction welding torch systems composed of fume extraction welding torches, extraction nozzle, extraction hose, extraction adapter; push pull welding torches, hybrid welding torches, dual and tandem welding torches; [ welding masks, welding helmets; ] electric blow torches, namely, welding torches; welding electrodes; cables, namely, coaxial cables, electric cables, water cooled power cables, gas cooled power cables; components of welding torches, namely, cables and cable assemblies for delivery of gas or water; cables for electrical or optical signal transmission; connecting apparatus, namely, cable and electric connectors, apparatus for conducting, distributing, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electric current; [ namely, current rectifiers, current converters, transformers, power supply units, servo amplifiers, electronic servo motor controllers; voltage regulators, electric couplings; instruments and machines for testing materials, namely, metal integrity testing device, weld integrity testing device; ] component parts and replacement parts for the above devices, namely, interconnection cables, gas diffusers, nozzles, fume extraction devices, wire guide for different wire types, coupling for water and gas, electric switches, electric cables, contact tips, welding torch connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |