USPTO serial 79007097
HYDROBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3229987Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HYDROBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff PLCP. O. Box 320850ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ * Fittings for lathes, * ] [ Machines and machine tools, namely, lathes, CNC lathes and machining centers, all used for metal processing ] [ * namely, * ] [ ; components and fittings for the aforementioned machines and machine tools, namely, chips conveyors, spindle liners, parts unloaders, ] bar feeders [, including hydraulic bar feeders; ] [ machine couplings; machine components, ] [ replacement parts and accessories for the above goods, namely, guiding elements, pushers, collets, outboard bearing blocks ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 8, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |