Drawing for Serial No. 79007131

USPTO serial 79007131

Serial No. 79007131

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3120869Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79007131?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Haarz

DAVID R HAARZ HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC11730 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVESUITE 600RESTON, VA 20190

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerators; air conditioners; freezers; electric hot water heaters; exhaust hoods for kitchens; hot water bottles; electric ice cream makers; electric popsicle making machines; electric hair dryers for household purposes; electric hot platesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 2, 2013INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2011INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 17, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 12, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 15, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance