Drawing for MOODLE

USPTO serial 79007168

MOODLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063893Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MOODLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

Christopher J. Schulte Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for creating dynamic, interactive web sites on networked computer servers that can be used by teachers and managers to facilitate collaboration, discussion, publishing, teaching and learning among groups of people such as schools, colleges, universities, companies and other communities.ACTIVE—
042Design of computer software and peripherals; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; rental of computer software; updating of computer software; computer security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired individuals; technical consultation in the field of computer software design and the integration of computer systems and networks; computer support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; repair of computer software.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 14, 2025PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Jul 14, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Apr 14, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 29, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 20, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 29, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 28, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 18, 2013CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 14, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 7, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 21, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 21, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 13, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 13, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance