USPTO serial 79007196
ZETTL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZETTL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Brock
Christopher M. Brock Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Money clips of common metal; bronzes in the nature of works of art, namely, sculptures of non-precious metal; busts made of common metal, base metals; works of art, namely, sculptures and busts made of base metals; copper, unwrought or semi-wrought; bins made of base metals; key rings; belt buckles made of base metals; metal chains; silver soldering metal; nickel alloys in the nature of nickel-silver; statues made of base metals; statuettes made of base metals; titanium; metal key fobs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewellery; money clips of precious metals; amber jewelry, namely, necklaces, bracelets, earrings, rings, brooches, pendants and cufflinks; amulets; bracelets as jewellery; brooches; busts made of precious metal; diamonds; precious metals; precious metal alloys; precious stones; semi-precious stones; necklaces; decorative boxes of precious metal; chains as jewellery; tie pins; works of art of precious metal in the nature of sculptures and busts; cuff links; lockets; earrings; pearls; rings as jewellery; pins as jewellery; belt buckles made of precious metal; napkin rings made of precious metal; silver jewellery; statues made of precious metal; imitation precious stones in the nature of strass; watches; alarm clocks; gold namely, raw or beaten gold; silver, namely, unmachined or embossed silver; platinum | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Repair of jewellery and watches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Silvering, gilding, chrome-plating, metal machining, namely, polishing, engraving, widening of finger rings, bending, bonding, soldering | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rechtsanwalt Dr. Wolfgang Bilgery as insolvency administrator of Friedrich Zettl GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Zettl GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ZETTL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |