Drawing for IRIS

USPTO serial 79007215

IRIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3104119Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2006
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IRIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eleanor Atkins

Eleanor Atkins MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP500 North Capitol Street, NWThe McDermott BuildingWashington, DC 20001-1531

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and optical apparatus and instruments for use in the fields of microlithography, semi-conductors, integrated circuits, [ magnetic domain memory ] and integrated optical systems, namely, computer hardware and peripherals used for the manufacture, fabrication and treatment of microlithography products, photolithographic masks, semiconductors, integrated circuits, computer wafers [ , computer processors, computer memory chips, magnetic heads, computer chips, liquid crystal displays, computer displays and integrated optical systems ] ; electronic and optical apparatus and instruments, namely, integrated optical systems comprised primarily of optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical data links, optical transceivers, optical filters, optical cables, optical disk drives, and optical semiconductor amplifiers; data processing apparatus, namely, computer hardware [ and peripherals, semiconductors, integrated circuits, photolithographic masks, magnetic heads, computer chips, semiconductor chips, silicon chips, memory chips and processor chips ] ; software for use with lithographic machines, namely, computer software used to operate machinery used for the manufacture, fabrication and treatment of microlithography products, photolithographic masks, semiconductors, integrated circuits, computer wafers, computer processors, computer memory chips, magnetic heads, computer chips, and integrated optical systems; software for use with lithographic machines, namely, computer software for the design, testing and fabrication of photolithographic masks, semiconductors, integrated circuits, computer wafers, computer memory chips, magnetic heads, computer chips, and integrated optical systems; [ software for use with lithographic machines, namely, computer aided design software; and replacement parts of the aforementioned goods; semiconductors, integrated circuits, photolithographic masks, magnetic heads, computer chips, semiconductor chips, silicon chips, memory chips and processor chips; computer memory, namely, magnetic domain memories; ] integrated optical systems comprised primarily of optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical data links, optical transceivers, optical filters, optical cables, optical disk drives, and optical semiconductor amplifiers * all the aforesaid goods neither for the automotive industry, nor used in the field of communications and information relating to drivers *ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 12, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 16, 2022LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 30, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2022LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 21, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 16, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 3, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 22, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 12, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 31, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2007CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 28, 2007LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance