Drawing for SOIGNON

USPTO serial 79007254

SOIGNON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3076897Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2006
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOIGNON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM C WRIGHT

WILLIAM C WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheeses; goat's cheeses; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cream; butter; milk; food specialties made of cheeses, namely, cheese fondue, cheese food, cheese powder, cheese spreads, cheese substitutes, cottage cheese, cream cheese, fresh unripened cheeses, mould ripened cheese, ripened cheese, sheep cheese, soft cheese, soft white cheese, strained cheese, white cheeseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 1, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 14, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 22, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance