USPTO serial 79007294
MY EYES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3109454Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 27, 2006
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY EYES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
MAUREEN C KASSNER AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for use in the field of Internet communication directed to freshness and shelf preservation of food, the origin of food and/or consumer products, safety of food, storage and transport of food and consumer products; CD-ROMs directed to freshness and shelf preservation of food, the origin of food and/or consumer products, safety of food, storage and transport of food and consumer products; electronic publications, namely electronic brochures, electronic newsletters, electronic magazines and electronic newspapers recorded on computer media featuring issues relating to freshness and shelf preservation of food, the origin of food and/or consumer products, safety of food storage and transport of food and consumer products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating to freshness and shelf preservation of food, the origin of food and/or consumer products; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by my eyes Group N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by my eyes Group N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by my eyes Group N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Alpuro Branding Assets B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MY EYES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |