USPTO serial 79007322
ARGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029502Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus,
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1827 POWERS FERRY ROADBUILDING 6, SUITE 200ATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrifugal pumps; centrifugal chemical pumps; centrifugal pumps for chemical and pharmaceutical industries | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |