Drawing for PIEROTH

USPTO serial 79007330

PIEROTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIEROTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, sparkling wines, brandy, beverages containing wineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 31, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 24, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 26, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005FAXXFAX SENT—
Aug 2, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance