USPTO serial 79007408
EISINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, ALINA S.
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EISINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen J. Hoover
ALLEN J HOOVER WOOD PHILLIPS KATZ CLARK & MORTIMERCITICORP CTR STE 3800500 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for heating, cooking, baking, steaming, grilling, frying, gratinating, toasting, cooling and freezing of food stuffs included in this class for use in household and large kitchens, namely; gas ranges and electric ranges; extractor hoods; deep fat fryers; gas cooking ovens, electric cooking ovens, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, and microwave cooking ovens; gas grills and electric indoor grills; and refrigerators and electric freezers; Hair dryers for household use and electric hot air hand dryers Apparatus for preparing hot or cold drinks included in this class, namely, temperature-controlled beverage dispensers, and components thereof; Sanitary installations, namely, tap water faucets, pipes, valves, and fittings; Sinks, wash basins, and shower basins made of metal, enamel, plastics, or ceramics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Kitchen furniture included in this class, also movable kitchen furniture; and Containers of plastic material and plastic tubs, all for storing liquids and foodstuffs, all included in this class; and Fixed towel dispensers not of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |