Drawing for HESA

USPTO serial 79007433

HESA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073757Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HESA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK LEBOW

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic alarm and anti-theft devices, namely, access control and alarm monitoring systems, access control and alarm systems having remote warning capability via radio and/or phone links and/or having dialing devices, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, fire alarms, personal security alarms, smoke alarms, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, acceleration sensors, theft alarms, electric, electronic and infrared sensors for monitoring light, sound, weight and/or movement, wireless visitor signal chimes, and replacement parts for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 23, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance