Drawing for CHARMER

USPTO serial 79007434

CHARMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066167Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C Bruce Hamburg

C Bruce Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Scissors; razorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 5, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance