Drawing for VIBES

USPTO serial 79007443

VIBES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174253Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIBES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN CLARK HOLMAN

JOHN CLARK HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco, matchesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 23, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2006REINREINSTATED—
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance