Drawing for SOFTWARE-TELEMETRY

USPTO serial 79007456

SOFTWARE-TELEMETRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOFTWARE-TELEMETRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary S Mathew

MARY S MATHEW COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1696UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment, namely, computer hardware, keyboards, monitors, mouse, printers, scanners and computer peripherals; magnetic data carriers, namely, pre-recorded compact discs for business process management and workflow management, namely automating, systematizing and structuring the administration and management of large industrial enterprises and public authorities, telecommunication enterprises, and the services involved with financial and planning services; compact discs and dvds containing software for data processing, computers, computer software for use in database management and for word processing in the fields of business process management and workflow management, namely, automating, systematizing and structuring the administration and management of large industrial enterprises and public authorities, telecommunication enterprises, and the services involved with financial and planning services; computer software for business process management and workflow management, namely, automating, systematizing and structuring the administration and management of large industrial enterprises and public authorities, telecommunication enterprises, and the services involved with financial and planning services; computer software for document and information management, storage, archiving and retrievalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Maintenance and repair of data processing equipment and computersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Providing of training and instruction in the field of electronically assisted data processing, holding of and carrying out of seminarsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Consultancy in the field of electronically assisted data processing; consultancy in the field of information technology; computer programmingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 8, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 12, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 14, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance