Drawing for OGMA

USPTO serial 79007485

OGMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213572Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OGMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Fields, Andrew Baum, Robert S. Weisbein, Amy J. Benjamin, Eric Prager, Karin Segall, Randi S. Miller, Heather C. Wilde, Laura J. Winston, Jonathan Matkowsky, Abigail R. Rubinstein and Kathryn Starnella

PAUL FIELDS, ANDREW BAUM, ROBERT S WEIS DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Engines for aircraftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012AircraftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Aircraft construction for others and aircraft maintenance and repairSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 25, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 2, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 31, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 11, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance