Drawing for HTS BIO

USPTO serial 79007510

HTS BIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237517Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HTS BIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Degreasing preparations namely plant-based compositions and essential oil compound for scrubbing all types of surfaces and mediaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 7, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 5, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 27, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 10, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 2, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 11, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2006RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance