Drawing for INTERSTAR

USPTO serial 79007527

INTERSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253844Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Friedrich Kueffner

FRIEDRICH KUEFFNER Lucas & Mercant LLP475 Park Avenue SouthNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, allocation, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electrical controllers and electricity conduits; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images; magnetic data carriers or pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring images; data processing equipment, namely, central processing units for processing information, data or images and computers; satellite receivers, digital satellite receivers; satellite aerials; LNB convertersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Air conditioning apparatus and parts of air conditioning installations, namely, air filters for air conditioning units and air conditioning panels for use in walk-in coolersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications, namely, telecommunication access servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 21, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance