Drawing for TROUBLE

USPTO serial 79007528

TROUBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3076900Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2006
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROUBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I Peoff

Mark I. Peroff, Esq. Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfume; eau de toilette; eau de cologne; deodorants for personal use; perfumery; essential oils for personal use; soaps; cosmetic creams; cleansing milks; face and body care lotions; bubble bath; and shower gelsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 25, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 6, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 31, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance