USPTO serial 79007534
ECKART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3082992Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ECKART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hartenstein, DE
D-90763 Fürth, DE
D-90763 Fürth, DE
D-90763 Fürth, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Gurfinkel
Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Lacquers and paints, also in aerosol can and/or pigmented with powders and pastes made from non-precious non-ferrous metals and their alloys; ferrous pigments, pearlescent pigments, metal-effects pigments, interference pigments, powder lacquers | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Non-precious metals and their alloys in the form of granules, flakes and powder and pastes made from such powders for industrial purposes, especially for the lacquer and paint industry, printing inks industry, graphical industry, paper industry, plastic industry, rubber industry, building material industry, pyrotechnical industry, explosives industry, electronic industry, chemical industry, pharmaceutical industry, cosmetics industry; foils reduced to small pieces, made from non-precious metal in regular forms, especially in the form of flakes, for industrial purposes, including lacquer and paint industry, and not for use by painters, decorators, printers and artists | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Working in of pigments in raw lacquers, especially bonding of powder lacquers, as services for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eckart GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eckart GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Eckart GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Eckart GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ECKART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |