Drawing for BELSHINA

USPTO serial 79007588

BELSHINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BELSHINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicle tires, casings for pneumatic tires, inner tubes for pneumatic tiresSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Rings of rubber for use with passenger cars, light trucks and motor units; as gaskets/spacers and sealing rings/collars for process equipment (curing molds), plumbing fixtures, testing equipment and machining attachmentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 29, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 3, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2005LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Dec 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 17, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance