USPTO serial 79007668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; collars and leashes for pets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture; beds and berths for pets; cushions and baskets of fabric or synthetic materials for pets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |