USPTO serial 79007730
CETALOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098330Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CETALOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH R. OBERT
KEITH R. OBERT WARE, FRESSOLA, MAGUIRE, & BARBER LLP55 Corporate Drive, Third FloorTrumbull, CT 06611United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Natural and artificial perfumes; [ cosmetics; soaps; ] essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |