Drawing for TOTAL COHESION

USPTO serial 79007763

TOTAL COHESION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066173Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL COHESION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

ANDREW ROPPEL HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749ATTN. TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; essential oils for personal use for relaxing, tonic, slimming and decongestant purposes; body oil, massage oil; cosmetic creams for cosmetic use for face and body care, hand cream, night creams, body and face massage cream, body and face modelling cream, cleansing cream for the face and body, facial and body scrub, exfoliating facial and body scrubs, marine salts for skin exfoliation, slimming cream and gels, cream and gel for the bust, envelopment preparations of algae, sea muds, mineral muds for cosmetic use, namely cosmetic wraps; non-medicated preparations for body and face cosmetic care made with concentrated marine algae, sea and mineral muds, sea salts, sea water, thermal water or spring water, namely oils, creams, gels, and pomadesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 7, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 20, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 20, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance