Drawing for HIPERADD

USPTO serial 79007774

HIPERADD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066174Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIPERADD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher B. Jacobs

Christopher B. Jacobs RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP1621 Euclid AvenueFloor 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely in the woodworking industry; unprocessed artificial resins for creating antibacterial material properties in application, [unprocessed plastics, manures; fire extinguishing compositions,] tempering chemicals for use in metal working or soldering, chemical products for the fresh-keeping and preservation of food; tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather; adhesives for general industrial useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 7, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 4, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 23, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 23, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 23, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 4, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 30, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Nov 30, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 19, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2011PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Sep 16, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2006COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Aug 25, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance